We have a number of developers that use dual CPU windows PCs for their WCs
and there are no problems. However my issue wasn't client side, it was with
the server running on a dual CPU system.
Has anyone had any experience hosting svnserve and the repository on a dual
CPU RAID 1 system (be it windows or otherwise)?
My experience was consistent reproducible corruption of the repository on
the SMP system, which went away only when I moved the repository to a single
CPU server.
Thanks,
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Falconer [mailto:lists_subversion_users@avsupport.com]
Sent: 19 January 2006 14:49
To: users@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: Re: Broken repository. svnadmin verify and dump report a checksum
mismatch.
Our SVN repository is on a single-CPU Linux server: many developers
work on
their WC's on a dual 1.3Ghz Linux server. I would suggest that, if it is a
problem with an SMP environment, it may be more specifically a Windows SMP
problem. More information:
developer machine
CPU: dual 1.3 Ghz PIII
OS: Debian 3.1 (kernel 2.6.11.10)
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 10:59 am, John Savage wrote:
> Linux isn't an option for us. We're a windows shop.
>
> Since my last post, I moved the svn server onto a single
processor/non-RAID
> computer and now the checksum mismatch problem has gone away!
>
> Could it be that the windows version of svnserve is not 100% stable on a
> multi-cpu system and results in intermittent repository crashes?
>
> Does anyone else out there run the windows SVN server on a multi-cpu
> server?
>
> When SVN reports a checksum mismatch, we are left pretty much dead in the
> water. Would it be possible to have some tool that helps in seeking out
and
> repairing broken checksums? Reporting an error is good, but helping to fix
> it would be even better.
>
> Thoughts, ideas, suggestions??
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Holger Rauch [mailto:holger.rauch@heitec.de]
> Sent: 17 January 2006 17:01
> To: John Savage
> Subject: Re: Broken repository. svnadmin verify and dump report a checksum
> mismatch.
>
> I don't know whether it's an option, but have you considered setting up
SVN
> on a Linux machine and trying the commits/checkouts you described again
> (just in order to see whether it's some OS-related issue)?
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.19/231 - Release Date:
16/01/2006
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.19/231 - Release Date:
16/01/2006
--
Best Regards,
Dan Falconer
"Head Geek",
AvSupport, Inc. (http://www.partslogistics.com)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.20/234 - Release Date: 18/01/2006
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.20/234 - Release Date: 18/01/2006
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jan 19 23:08:23 2006