RE: Apache or svnserve?

Well yes this is needed, but currently CVS folders are authorized through the common unix groups.
This should be the same with svnserve as well.

To understand that. When using Apache, the folders/files will have 'subversionwhatever' as the user&group and Apache does the control for the users?
The users do not have to be in unix groups?

Thorsten

-----Original Message-----
From: Çağatay Çatal [mailto:cagatay.catal@bte.mam.gov.tr]
Sent: Montag, 28. November 2005 09:48
To: Thorsten Schacht; users@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: RE: Apache or svnserve?

If you want to use "authorization per directory",
you should use Apache.

This was a requirement in my project and then, I used Apache.

I hope this helps you,

Cheers,
Cagatay

-----Original Message-----
From: Thorsten Schacht [mailto:thorstens@tcelectronic.com]
Sent: 28 Kasım 2005 Pazartesi 10:33
To: users@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: Apache or svnserve?

Hi,

I'm trying to find out what authorization method is the best for me. I
cant find out much about pro's and con's so I ask you experienced users
: )

Needed is a Subversion for 15 developers in a company. Only internal
use. No web interface / statistics etc. needed.

Currently we use CVS with ssh so I'm more at the svnserve side and think
Apache is too much for my needs.

And how exactly works the Auth through Apache?

Please share your experience with me.

Cheers,
Thorsten

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Nov 28 10:06:39 2005