hm... this i don't get, why should this work? i mean LimitExcept does
limit all actions except the ones mentioned. now i want to have X,Y
having write access but would placing them inside the LimitExcept block
not 'disallow' exactly this? this all just confuses me a bit as like
said in the current situation all works fine for X,Y put Z doesn't get a
login (error logs shows he has no access at all).
Tim Olsen wrote:
>I think you have it reversed.
>
>You want to put Require user Z outside the LimitExcept block, and
>Require user X Y inside the LimitExcept block
>
>-Tim
>
>On 11/21/05, Plüss Roland <rptd@gmx.net> wrote:
>
>
>>i operate my svn server through apache and up to now had no anonymous
>>access to projects but need it now. what i want is having certain users
>>X and Y to have modify access to a certain repository and a guest Z only
>>read. for some reason i can not get this to work. here the part of my
>>apache config dealing with the problem:
>>
>><Location /cp>
>> Order deny,allow
>> AuthType Basic
>> AuthName ****
>> AuthLDAPUrl ldap:*****
>> AuthLDAPBindDN *****
>> AuthLDAPBindPassword *****
>> Require user X Y
>> <LimitExcept GET PROPFIND OPTIONS REPORT>
>> Require user Z
>> </LimitExcept>
>></Location>
>>
>>somebody can point out why i can operate successfully as X or Y but as Z
>>i get upon 'svn co' always an 'access denied' in my apache logs?
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
>>For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
>
Received on Mon Nov 21 21:35:06 2005