[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: SVN / Make Integration

From: William Ahern <wahern_at_barracudanetworks.com>
Date: 2005-11-16 10:03:22 CET

On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 09:49 +0100, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
> William Ahern wrote:
> > So, I'm migrating our build to a non-recursive make. One adverse side
> > effect is that when somebody branches to fix a minor bug, in order to
> > use build their sub-project they have to checkout the entire branch
> > (which is huge). Previously somebody could checkout a smaller portion
> > of a branch to do their work.
>
> You still can do that. Firstly, you don't have to branch the whole
> project when working on a module. It might be a bit cleaner but
> depending on the amount of changes it might be "just not worth the
> hassle".
> Then, you can switch parts of your normal working directory to the
> branched module. IOW, you have a repository containing the main
> development line with just one module being replaced with the branch.
>

Hmmmmm. The problem here is that some of our "modules" are actually
composed of files and directories spread around the tree (and for good
reason, so it's not something I can fix). Their only common parent
directory is the root of the entire branch, so that would put me back at
square one.

-- 
William Ahern <wahern@barracudanetworks.com>
--------------------------------------------------
This message was scanned for Spam, Spyware and Viruses
For more information, please visit:
http://www.barracudanetworks.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Nov 16 10:08:55 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.