And that is primarily what our team would be using Subversion for.
'Just' version control, check in check out control, lock file if checked
out etc. Often times, we are dealing with just 1 .asp or 1 .html page
and don't need to reversion or check out the entire directory that that
1 file lives in. I'd like to see the option in Subversion, to just
check out and check in and reversion 1 file (or 2 files, etc) instead of
said mentioned entire directory.
-Gary
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Schmidt [mailto:subversion-2005@ryandesign.com]
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 10:04 AM
To: Noel Yap
Cc: Paul Koning; Graeme.Thompson@smiths-aerospace.com; List Subversion
Subject: Re: Potential New User questions
On Nov 11, 2005, at 18:13, Noel Yap wrote:
> On 11/11/05, Paul Koning <pkoning@equallogic.com> wrote:
>
>> Incidentally, the only way I see of having "original" timestamps and
>> still having "make" work is the Clearcase approach, where dependent
>> files are marked as to which version of source they came from, and
>> any change at all in the source -- timestamp (or version) change
>> either forward OR backward) -- forces a rebuild. That sort of thing
>> is very nice indeed -- and quite hard to do.
>
> There are more modern build systems than make that uses MD5 hashes (eg
> SCons).
And there are a good number of Subversion users who aren't building
anything but are rather making websites or tracking non-code files.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Nov 12 00:16:25 2005