[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Relative performance of http:// vs. svn://

From: Christopher Ness <chris_at_nesser.org>
Date: 2005-09-19 18:11:42 CEST

On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 17:44 +0200, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 11:17 -0400, Christopher Ness wrote:
> > A big advantage of Apache is the Authz Access Control List. But
> > per-directory authorization is being worked on for svnserve as well.
> Cool, there's plan for having virtual users and encrypted protocol as
> well ?

An encrypted protocol could be implemented with an SSH tunnel,
ie svn+ssh://

As for "virtual users" - I think you mean users who do not have accounts
on the server itself. Reading this part of the book
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.1/ch06s03.html seems to suggest that
tunneling causes an external authentication. Perhaps SSH could have
"virtual users" - I don't know you would have to ask on the SSH list.

But if you _do_not_ use a tunnel I would expect you could create as many
users and passwords as you'd like in svnserve.conf without requiring
these to be users of the system.


PGP Public Key: http://www.nesser.org/pgp-key/
11:58:40 up 1:09, 2 users, load average: 0.02, 0.15, 0.21

Received on Mon Sep 19 18:14:49 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.