[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn and ant

From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2005-09-18 10:26:26 CEST

On 18/09/05, Ryan Schmidt <subversion-2005@ryandesign.com> wrote:
> On Sep 16, 2005, at 16:29, Dave Pawson wrote:

> If you mean the Ant script, then I'd say that's outside the scope of
> the Subversion book.
Yes, I'd agree

> If you meant the wisdom that the .svn directories are important for
> Subversion and not to be indiscriminately deleted, then The Book does
> at least try to suggest that [1]:
> "A working copy also contains some extra files, created and
> maintained by Subversion [...]. In particular, each directory in your
> working copy contains a subdirectory named .svn, also known as the
> working copy administrative directory."
> The only way I see for it to be clearer would be to add "Do not
> delete the administrative directories or any of their contents" but
> shouldn't that go without saying?

If only users didn't do such silly things
(at least once :-)

<quote>The only thing about common sense, is that it isn't quite so


Dave Pawson
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Sep 18 10:28:20 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.