Re: svn and ant

On 18/09/05, Ryan Schmidt <subversion-2005@ryandesign.com> wrote:
> On Sep 16, 2005, at 16:29, Dave Pawson wrote:

> If you mean the Ant script, then I'd say that's outside the scope of
> the Subversion book.
Yes, I'd agree

>
> If you meant the wisdom that the .svn directories are important for
> Subversion and not to be indiscriminately deleted, then The Book does
> at least try to suggest that [1]:
>
> "A working copy also contains some extra files, created and
> maintained by Subversion [...]. In particular, each directory in your
> working copy contains a subdirectory named .svn, also known as the
> working copy administrative directory."
>
> The only way I see for it to be clearer would be to add "Do not
> delete the administrative directories or any of their contents" but
> shouldn't that go without saying?

True...
If only users didn't do such silly things
(at least once :-)

<quote>The only thing about common sense, is that it isn't quite so
common</quote>

regards

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org