[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Perforce outperforms Subversion (by a lot sometimes)

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2005-09-17 19:08:01 CEST

Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@collab.net> writes:
> They're totally different design philosophies. Perforce is designed
> for a LAN, and the server happily tracks every sandbox of every
> developer. CVS and Subversion are designed for the WAN... lots of
> disconnected work happening, and a potentially unlimited number of
> self-sustaining sandboxes. (Which is why it's so good for open-
> source work -- and anonymous checkouts.)
> I don't think Subversion has any goals of changing its design
> philosophy here...

Yes. Obviously, we're always interested in making Subversion faster,
but tracking client-side state on the server would be wandering pretty
far from Subversion's basic design. We should find other ways to do

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Sep 17 20:13:50 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.