Re: Relative performance of http:// vs. svn://
From: Daniel Morbach Serodio <dserodio_at_mandic.com.br>
Date: 2005-09-16 15:24:13 CEST
Thanks for the information. I find HTTP access to be extremely convenient, is
Thanks,
---- Mensagem Original ----
From: "Carsten Koch"
To: "Daniel Morbach Serodio"
Sent: Qui, Setembro 15, 2005 12:44 pm
Subject: Re: Relative performance of http:// vs. svn://
> Daniel Morbach Serodio wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Does anyone have any numbers wrt the relative performance of the http and
>> svn protocols?
>
> I do not have exact numbers, but I know that http can be
> e - x - t - r - e - m - e - l - y s - l - o - w
> sometimes. See the thread
> "svn list -R of medium-size repository takes 10 hours."
> in this list.
> Just today I got a call from one of my users who complained
> how very slow "svn co" is compared to "gunzip < f | tar xf -".
> So, if performance is very important to you, you may be
> better off with the svn protocol.
>
> Carsten.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.