Re: Relative performance of http:// vs. svn://
From: Daniel Morbach Serodio <dserodio_at_mandic.com.br>
 
Date: 2005-09-16 15:24:13 CEST 
Thanks for the information. I find HTTP access to be extremely convenient, is
 Thanks,
 ---- Mensagem Original ----
 From: "Carsten Koch"
 To: "Daniel Morbach Serodio"
 Sent: Qui, Setembro 15, 2005 12:44 pm
 Subject: Re: Relative performance of http:// vs. svn://
 > Daniel Morbach Serodio wrote:
 >> Hi!
 >>
 >> Does anyone have any numbers wrt the relative performance of the http and
 >> svn protocols?
 >
 > I do not have exact numbers, but I know that http can be
 > e - x - t - r - e - m - e - l - y    s - l - o - w
 > sometimes. See the thread
 > "svn list -R of medium-size repository takes 10 hours."
 > in this list.
 > Just today I got a call from one of my users who complained
 > how very slow "svn co" is compared to "gunzip < f | tar xf -".
 > So, if performance is very important to you, you may be
 > better off with the svn protocol.
 >
 > Carsten.
 >
 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
 > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
 > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
 >
 >
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
  | 
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.