[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: fsfs and Linux filesystems

From: Paul Koning <pkoning_at_equallogic.com>
Date: 2005-09-16 02:38:13 CEST

>>>>> "Christopher" == Christopher Ness <chris@nesser.org> writes:

 Christopher> On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 09:04 -0400, Christopher Ness
 Christopher> wrote:
>> All that is needed is some actual data tests on the different FS'.
>> ;)

 Christopher> I took some time today to look at ReiserFS 3.5 and Ext3
 Christopher> on one of my lower performance machines.

 Christopher> You can see the hard data from GNU time at this URL and
 Christopher> the dump file for the test repository I built using the
 Christopher> stress.pl script.
 Christopher> http://www.nesser.org/pub/ext3-reiser/

 Christopher> The verdict is that Reiser is faster and smaller in
 Christopher> size. I'm not sure though if it is linearly faster or
 Christopher> logarithmically faster based on working copy size.

Interesting. What isn't clear given the way you ran the test: is the
difference at the server, or at the client end. Switching the server
to reiser could be an option; switching 50 clients is harder...


To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Sep 16 02:40:28 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.