[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: More performance

From: Paul Koning <pkoning_at_equallogic.com>
Date: 2005-09-15 15:06:54 CEST

>>>>> "Hari" == Hari Kodungallur <hkodungallur@gmail.com> writes:

 Hari> I would also like to add here the speed of branching. With a
 Hari> project of this size, i would think there would be many
 Hari> branches and tags. For a 70,000 file project the comparison
 Hari> would be: less than a second for SVN vs. several minutes (if
 Hari> not hours) for CVS

15-20 minutes for CVS. Yes indeed, and that is the main reason why we
want a better solution. I'm really hoping that SVN will offer
acceptable performance with the the regular development cycle commands
(status, diff, update, commit) -- better than CVS preferably, similar
to CVS worst case. And of course it has to be reliable, which at this
point remains to be seen. Given those requirements, then the vastly
better tag performance is a major win, since we do several of those
each day.

     paul

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Sep 15 15:09:08 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.