Re: "svn cp" has different permissions semantics than "svn co"
From: Jeff Squyres <jsquyres_at_open-mpi.org>
 
Date: 2005-09-12 20:04:49 CEST 
On Sep 12, 2005, at 10:11 AM, Joshua Varner wrote:
 >> I would agree -- printing warnings would be a good first step (in both
 Not a bad idea.  I can definitely see how silent rejection is good in 
 But I think that the default configuration should follow the Law of 
 svn checkout: no authorization for "/trunk/foo/bar"; skipping and 
 Someone obviously thought about this when they implemented "co" that 
 a) print a warning (perhaps only the first time you "svn co" or "svn 
 and/or
 b) leave an empty directory there as a token (e.g., so that the user 
 Just another $0.02...
 
-- 
{+} Jeff Squyres
{+} The Open MPI Project
{+} http://www.open-mpi.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Sep 12 20:09:53 2005
 | 
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.