Re: "svn cp" has different permissions semantics than "svn co"
From: Jeff Squyres <jsquyres_at_open-mpi.org>
Date: 2005-09-12 20:04:49 CEST
On Sep 12, 2005, at 10:11 AM, Joshua Varner wrote:
>> I would agree -- printing warnings would be a good first step (in both
Not a bad idea. I can definitely see how silent rejection is good in
But I think that the default configuration should follow the Law of
svn checkout: no authorization for "/trunk/foo/bar"; skipping and
Someone obviously thought about this when they implemented "co" that
a) print a warning (perhaps only the first time you "svn co" or "svn
and/or
b) leave an empty directory there as a token (e.g., so that the user
Just another $0.02...
-- {+} Jeff Squyres {+} The Open MPI Project {+} http://www.open-mpi.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Mon Sep 12 20:09:53 2005 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.