[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Re: Is subversion SOX (sarbanes-oxley) compliant?

From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin_at_dberlin.org>
Date: 2005-09-07 19:07:20 CEST

On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 19:00 +0200, Goddard Lee wrote:
> > > (http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=SVN)
> > >
> > > As you can expect, managers want our SCM to be SOX compliant. PVCS
> > > claims to be SOX compliant. Is subversion SOX compliant?
> >
> > This question is non-sensible, since SOX is not about what
> > products you use, but about the processes and controls in place.
> >
> > You can certainly be SOX compliant using Subversion, if you
> > wanted to. --Dan
>
> Have the issues on the above URI be addressed yet? If not, we're certainly not going to be able to make our SVN public-facing :( Or I'm going to have to start learning SVN source code...

They were addressed in releases that are at least a year old :)

CAN-2004-0413 was addressed in 1.0.5
CAN-2004-0749 was addressed in 1.0.8 and 1.1.0-rc4
CAN-2004-1438 was addressed in 1.0.6

The current stable release is 1.2.3

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Sep 7 19:12:22 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.