[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Is subversion SOX (sarbanes-oxley) compliant?

From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin_at_dberlin.org>
Date: 2005-09-07 18:51:22 CEST

On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 12:36 -0400, Joshua.White@hartfordlife.com wrote:
> All,
> I am trying to put together a case to use subversion instead of PVCS
> at my company (If you could point me to any resources on this, I
> would appreciate it!) I have been receiving a lot of push back about
> subversion having security vulnerabilities. See the following:
> http://secunia.com/ (http://secunia.com/search/?search=SVN)
> or
> http://www.cve.mitre.org/
> (http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=SVN)
> As you can expect, managers want our SCM to be SOX compliant. PVCS
> claims to be SOX compliant. Is subversion SOX compliant?

This question is non-sensible, since SOX is not about what products you
use, but about the processes and controls in place.

You can certainly be SOX compliant using Subversion, if you wanted to.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Sep 7 18:53:30 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.