Re: BUG? svn list does NOT respect --revision 640 on a file that is deleted in revision 647

On 18.08.2005, at 14:45, Jon Bendtsen wrote:

> I dont know if the above is a BUG or not, but i expected a
> different answer than what i've got from svn list
>
> frodo:/tmp# svn list --revision 640 --verbose http://localhost/data/
> svn/jontest/laesmig.txt
> svn: REPORT request failed on '/data/svn/!svn/bc/647/jontest/
> laesmig.txt'
> svn: '/data/svn/!svn/bc/647/jontest/laesmig.txt' path not found
>
> file laesmig.txt is deleted in revision 647 or 646.
>
> frodo:/tmp# svn list --revision 640 --verbose http://localhost/data/
> svn/jontest/t.sh
> 639 jbendtse 335 Aug 18 12:29 t.sh
> frodo:/tmp# svn list --revision 630 --verbose http://localhost/data/
> svn/jontest/t.sh
> 597 jbendtse 327 Aug 16 12:54 t.sh
>
>
> I expected svn list to give me the above line for revision 640 for
> the file laesmig.txt even if it was deleted since that.
>
>
> I searched in the issue tracker on list, and could not find
> previous reports of this.

The relevant concept is called a "peg revision". See this thread from
May:

http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2005-05/0492.shtml

It alludes to a section appearing in The Book "soon" which may mean
that it's in there now.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Aug 18 15:51:17 2005