I remember that someone did a performance comparison between bdb and fsfs
some time ago and posted his results to this list, but I have no time to
search the archives now for this. It must have been a short time after fsfs
was integrated into svn. Maybe you can find it.
As far as I remember the fsfs was performing better over large (all?)
comparison areas (if you use a decent file system to host it). Only in one
thing bdb was performing better, but I cannot remember what exactly it
was...
2005/8/18, Kenneth.S.Brooks@chase.com <Kenneth.S.Brooks@chase.com>:
>
> Is there any documentation or places that have shown
> how the different storage mechanisms scale?
>
> Does fsfs scale as well as bdb?
> Is there a (reasonable)limit, both byte wise as well as number of commits?
> Is there a performance degredation using fsfs on large/multiple
> repositories?
>
>
> If you would be kind enough to point me in the right direction...
>
> Thanks,
> Ken
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential
> and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the
> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
> distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any
> reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission
> in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in
> its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you
> **********************************************************************
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
--
Oliver Pajonk
Received on Thu Aug 18 09:52:54 2005