[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: git is a lot better than SVN (???)

From: Carl Baldwin <cnb_at_fc.hp.com>
Date: 2005-08-17 17:41:33 CEST

In what sense is the 'large-scale efficiency' better than git? From the
homepage its hard to tell the difference between it and git.

Carl

On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 05:35:41PM +0200, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> You might also want to try Mercurial, which has similar functionality to
> git, bazaar et al., but seems to have much better large-scale
> efficiency:
> http://www.selenic.com/hg/?cmd=file;filenode=b0166ba7a8977756db92a88634da162844af978f;file=comparison.txt
>
> (home page: http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/)
>
> regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>

-- 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 Carl Baldwin                        Systems VLSI Laboratory
 Hewlett Packard Company
 MS 88                               work: 970 898-1523
 3404 E. Harmony Rd.                 work: Carl.N.Baldwin@hp.com
 Fort Collins, CO 80525              home: Carl@ecBaldwin.net
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Aug 17 17:45:14 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.