[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: early reflections on subversion methodology

From: Branko ─îibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2005-08-01 23:03:07 CEST

David Weintraub wrote:

>So, it seems rather strange that Subversion doesn't understand the
>built in concepts of branches and tags. Instead, these items are
>merely emulated via pseudo-directories. After all, tags and branches
>have been implemented as part of version control systems since RCS
>back in 1985.
>
>
Subversion certainly does understand branches and tags. The important
feature of branches (and tags -- these are just branches that are never
changed after creation) is that they establish a (named) parallel line
of development that tracks its ancestry and can expose ancestry
information to procedures that need it, e.g., merge.

 From what I've been able to gather from this thread, people are either
upset or confused because directories and branches share the same
namespace, whilst most other VC systems in use today have a separate
namespace for branches.

But this is in fact just a UI detail. It does not meant that SVN doesn't
"support" branches, and it certainly doesn't make SVN's branches
second-class objects. There's also a huge benefit in having a single
namespace -- namely, WebDAV/DeltaV interoperability. We'd have had a lot
more trouble getting that if we had more than one namespace.

-- Brane

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Aug 1 23:05:26 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.