AW: Re: early reflections on subversion methodology
From: Felix Gilcher <gilcher_at_exozet.com>
Date: 2005-08-01 12:00:12 CEST
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
[snip]
> >
We're using both approaches, some projects have their own repository, others share one repo and both ways are pretty much equal. Both ways offer advantages of their own kind, but I would not agree to the point that having multiple projects sharing one repository renders versioning across the board meaningless in any way. The only important point is that a version number alone does not describe a checkout, it's always the tupel (versionnumber, path) that uniquely identifies an object - even in the "one project, one repo" approach.
[snip]
> - thomas beale
-- Felix Gilcher Head of IT Development Exozet Berlin GmbH Rotherstraße 20 10245 Berlin eMail: gilcher@exozet.com URL: www.exozet.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Mon Aug 1 12:03:10 2005 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.