Umm, no. If someone checked in an updated foo.c at rev 25 and you have
not updated since then, then an svn co -r 30 would receive foo.c at rev 25
and bar.c at revision 30, while your WC would still show foo.c at rev 20
-----Original Message-----
From: Jan W. Hentsch [mailto:jwh@csmed.de]
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 3:59 PM
To: 'Hari Kodungallur'
Cc: users@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: RE: Global Revision keyword, again and again
> In this situation, the "program --version" would not give the
> right information. The user might have foo.c at revision 20
> and bar.c at revision 30. It is a mistake to say that the
> user's code is at revision 20. It is also a mistake to say
> that it is at revision 30. There can not be one revision
> representing the whole working copy.
>
You are right, the program --version would give me the highest
revision which belongs to one of its components.
When I take this information an do a svn co -r 30 I would still get
foo.c at rev 20 and bar.c at rev 30. Even if foo.c got an increased
revision number later on, I would get it the same way it got
assigned to my project when my wished keyword was automatically updated,
right?
cu jwh
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
- application/x-pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Sat Jul 30 01:15:38 2005