[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn up known issue?

From: Gary Thomas <gary_at_mlbassoc.com>
Date: 2005-07-27 01:15:42 CEST

On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 14:18 -0700, jason marshall wrote:
 ... snip
> I encourage the SVN team to reassess their definition of 'reasonable
> working set', and consider if the tool as currently presented can meet
> reasonable performance metrics given that definition.

What do you consider a "ridiculously large" working copy?
I routinely work with branches that have nearly 50,000 files in
them (totalling over 1GB) and find the performance of subversion
quite acceptable.

Of course, things do run much faster if I can pick out only the
pieces I'm interested in (which is made much easier by a great
tool like subversion!)

Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jul 27 01:17:34 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.