[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: SVN Security

From: John <jsparrow_at_ecclescollege.ac.uk>
Date: 2005-07-17 18:20:47 CEST

Marc Sherman <msherman <at> projectile.ca> writes:

>
> Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> >
> > KDE has ~500,000 revisions in their one repository, and I think it's
> > using FSFS. No problems reported.
>
> They're probably not hosting their repository on NTFS, though.

Would it be better to partition the revs into seperate directories
(locking-esque) or just roll them together into bigger files? I like the
'rolling' idea because it will increase the average file size - improve storage
efficiency (that could be an issue when you have 500,000 x 2 rev files!!)

I'd imagine rolling would be a svnadmin function, that would be run 'hot' every
month or so. Not something that happens in realtime (and hence break rev-file
imutability).

John

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Jul 17 18:22:52 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.