RE: SVN Security
From: Calvin <szguoxz_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 2005-07-17 10:45:04 CEST
Since I really want to try SVN, I forced myself to spend 1 hour on Apache.
Now the question about security again:
In Perforce, I could say:
Developers -w //perforce /....build
Basically all the developers won't have write access to all *.build files in
If SVN can do this, it'll be great. But if it can not, I can live with it. I
Now I start to love SVN, only hope it's as stable as Perforce.
Thanks,
Calvin
-----Original Message-----
Yea, the only problem is Apache. I've already have IIS on my server, not
If SVN server can provide decent security configuration, it will be a killer
-----Original Message-----
Calvin <szguoxz <at> hotmail.com> writes:
> Well, The per-directory security is just too difficult to understand and
I've been using SVN on win32 for about 18 months. The security features are
========
How difficult can that be?? Hopefully in time these permissions will be
The requirement for Apache on a windows box is less ideal when you are
Transparent config files are something Microsoft is (sloooowwwly!)
John
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.