Re: SVN Security

Branko Èibej <brane@xbc.nu> wrote on 16.07.2005 07:08:41:

> Calvin wrote:
>
> >Well, The per-directory security is just too difficult to understand
and
> >implement.
> >
> >
> Ah. No comment.
>
> >Any plan to implement security feature in SubVersion in future?
> >
> >
> I'm curious, what is this "security feature" you're referring to?
>

Yes, me too :) Also the road-map quite obviously states that better/proper
ACLs are going to be implemented, but I guess you have to read it first.

Anyway, I know that there was discussion on what features to implement in
1.3. Have the winners been anounced yet?

Cheers,

---
  Miha Vitorovic
  In¾enir v tehniènem podroèju
  Customer Support Engineer
   NIL Data Communications,  Tivolska cesta 48,  1000 Ljubljana,  Slovenia
   Phone +386 1 4746 500      Fax +386 1 4746 501     http://www.NIL.si