RE: Updating to revision before copy of branch

> From: Greg Fodor [mailto:greg@parature.com
>
> Hmm.. I see your point. But doesn't this then invalidate the
> clarification that copy is "with history"? If it were with
> history, then
> essentially the entire repository would behave, post copy, as if the
> branch existed back in revision 50 as well?

Well, that's not what Subversion means by "with history". It means "this
file is a modified version of some particular earlier revision of some
particular file". And it's a principle of SCM that past revisions are never
changed.

Dale

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jul 5 18:03:06 2005