[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: I lost 7 bdb repositories yesterday!

From: Christoph Bartoschek <bartoschek_at_or.uni-bonn.de>
Date: 2005-07-05 14:42:20 CEST

Am Dienstag 05 Juli 2005 14:31 schrieb Ben Collins-Sussman:

> svnserve is acting as a *network* gateway, perhaps... but there's
> nothing preventing some other program linked to libsvn_fs from
> accessing the repository as well. For example, you might have a hook-
> script that runs 'svnlook'. Or a user with a shell on the system
> might run 'svn checkout file:///'.
> The point is that there's no ueber-process guarding the health of the
> tables themselves. Instead, there's a bunch of libsvn_fs processes
> potentially all accessing the repository at once -- svnserve,
> mod_dav_svn, svn, svnlook, svnadmin -- all equal peers, all unaware
> of each other. Any one of these programs could wedge the database,
> and none of the programs knows how to detect this and un-wedge.

In our case the only way to access the database is with svn:// because all
other protocols are disabled. svnlook and svnadmin are only used when
svnserve is stopped. Therefore developers use always the same svnserve
daemon. Given this scenario: when two developers access svnserve at nearly
the same time. Are the libsvn_fs accesses still independent?


To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jul 5 14:49:15 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.