Re: Date processing should be more flexible
From: Scott Palmer <scott.palmer_at_2connected.org>
Date: 2005-07-04 15:16:51 CEST
On Jul 4, 2005, at 5:04 AM, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> On 7/4/05, McKenna, Simon (RGH) <Simon.McKenna@rgh.sa.gov.au> wrote:
That's the ONLY *natural* order. Larger units to the left, as others
With the 4 digit year it is also the least ambiguous. That is one
> ISO requires the '-' character.
I don't think it does, perhaps it is a recommendation, but I don't
As far as parsing it goes, ANY non-numeric character can be treated
Scott
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.