[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn lock gives different output with --force?

From: Aniruddha Apte <aniapte_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2005-06-30 10:50:47 CEST

Got it, should have read the book better :(

This http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.advanced.locking.html#svn.advanced.locking.break-steal
explains it.

So, breaking or stealing a lock is disallowed unless the --force
option is used, in which case it is allowed always. This is level 1
checking.

Admins can put in a hook for level 2 checking. So, the hook will be
executed ONLY if --force is specified.

On 30/06/05, Aniruddha Apte <aniapte@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a pre-lock hook that disallows locking if the path is already
> locked and the new lock requester is different from the original
> locker. In such a case, the script will print to stderr.
>
> I am getting a difference in the output of svn lock with and without
> --force as shown below.
>
> svn lock foo.h
> svn: Lock request failed: 423 Locked (http://192.168.10.25)
>
> svn lock --force foo.h
> svn: 'pre-lock' hook failed with error output:
> Error: /USERS/aniruddha/src/foo.h already locked by anil.
>
> why the difference? doesn't the pre-lock hook get executed in case 1?
>
> many thanks
> -anir
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jun 30 11:19:34 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.