The 'tags' tree is only static if you put permissions / access control
on that part of the tree to keep users from modifying it. According to
the docs, standard operating procedure says to make it static, but I
found out the hard way that if you don't set the right permissions, some
developer may accidentally check back into that tree.
Regards,
Frank
kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>Servico Tpd Rodrigo Alfonso Menezes Madera <tpd.madera@telefonica.com.br> writes:
>
>
>
>>Sorry for this stupid question, but isnīt the tags suposed to be static?
>>(such as releases or something like that).
>>
>>Iīm still studying these subversion branch stuff. Thanks for the light.
>>
>>
>
>Yes. I thought that's what was wanted, though?
>
>
>-K
>
>
>
>
>> kfogel@collab.ne
>> t Para: "O'Hearn, Mike" <Mike.OHearn@jenzabar.net>
>> Enviado Por: cc: users@subversion.tigris.org
>> kfogel@newton.ch Assunto: Re: Locking to prevent changes to a branch?
>> .collab.net
>>
>>
>> 22/06/2005 18:49
>> Responder a
>> kfogel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>"O'Hearn, Mike" <Mike.OHearn@jenzabar.net> writes:
>>
>>
>>>I want to prevent from accidental changes to an old branch. We are new to
>>>subversion and I find that a lot of people accidentally work in the wrong
>>>working copy.
>>>
>>>Is locking the entire branch a good solution? Any downsides to this? Any
>>>other suggestions?
>>>
>>>
>>It's a good solution, but consider moving that branch to the 'tags/'
>>directory and locking it down there. I believe svnbook.red-bean.com
>>goes into detail on this.
>>
>>-Karl
>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
>>For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>>
>>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
>
>
Received on Thu Jun 23 03:47:03 2005