[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: FSFS vs DB on 1.2

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2005-06-16 18:39:02 CEST

On Jun 16, 2005, at 11:32 AM, Ron Gilbert wrote:

> I am going to be upgrading my system to 1.2, and I'm wondering what
> the advantages/disadvantages of using FSFS for my repositories are?
> All my users connect via svn:// (From WindowsXP to a FreeBSD
> server), no one connects locally (except the admin, now and then)
> or via WebDAV. Repositories typically house 3000 files, most of
> which are large (1MB+) binary files.
> Is one more robust then the other? I do worry about using a DB due
> to corruption issues. Is this a reasonable concern, or is the FSFS
> repository just as complex in it's own way.

Did you read the book section which compares BDB and FSFS?


To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jun 16 18:43:53 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.