I have been running SVN under Apache 2, Windows 2003 and Berkeley DB
for 1 year now, and never had any problems.
Matheus
2005/6/10, Jackie Smith Cashion <jackie@arxceo.com>:
>
>
> I've been running a subversion server (FSFS, Apache) on a Windows 2003
> server. (Certainly, Windows 2003 is not my first choice, but it's the only
> available server.) I recently noticed that one of the directories in my
> repository has become "hosed". (I won't use the word "wedged". That seems to
> be reserved for bdb repositories.) Fortunately it's an empty branches
> directory (file:///svn/repos/branches).
>
> Perhaps I'll start another thread next week detailing the error messages I
> receive when trying to access this directory. In the end the question will
> be whether the subversion database is "hosed" or the native Windows file
> system has become corrupt.
>
> But I would like to start with a simpler discussion. Are other facilities
> successfully running svn under Windows 2003? Are you using FSFS? Are you
> using Apache? I would prefer to stay with my current server for cost
> reasons. However, if this is a rare configuration, it may justify the
> expense of a new server running a more popular configuration.
>
> I know I'll hear comments about linux vs. Windows. But I'd also like to hear
> comments about svnserver vs. Apache and bdb vs. fsfs under Windows.
>
> Any comments would be appreciated. Thanks.
>
> Jackie Smith Cashion
> Arxceo Corporation
> jackie@arxceo.com
--
------------------------------
Matheus Costa Leite
matheus@mindsatwork.com.br
Minds at Work
Tecnologia da Informação
------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jun 13 07:11:55 2005