List Master: I submitted this request last week, but it
never made it to the list. Perhaps I formatted my text
improperly, so I'm resending in plain text. Perhaps I've
posted to the wrong list or need to register. If so,
please let me know. Thanks.
-- Jackie Smith Cashion, jackie@arxceo.com
If you're running a Windows 2003 SVN server, I'd like to
hear if you've had success creating a stable repository
using Apache and FSFS.
I've been running a subversion server (FSFS, Apache) on a
Windows 2003 server. (Certainly, Windows 2003 is not my
first choice, but it's the only available server.) I recently
noticed that one of the directories in my repository has become
"hosed". (I won't use the word "wedged". That seems to be
reserved for bdb repositories.) Fortunately it's an empty
branches directory (file:///svn/repos/branches).
Perhaps I'll start another thread next week detailing the
error messages I receive when trying to access this directory.
In the end the question will be whether the subversion database
is "hosed" or the native Windows file system has become corrupt.
But I would like to start with a simpler discussion. Are other
facilities successfully running svn under Windows 2003? Are you
using FSFS? Are you using Apache? Have you experienced any
repository/database/filesystem problems? I would prefer to stay
with my current server for cost reasons. However, if this is a
rare configuration, it may justify the expense of a new server
running a more popular configuration.
I know I'll hear comments about linux vs. Windows, but I'd also
like to hear comments about svnserver vs. Apache and bdb vs. fsfs
under Windows.
Any comments would be appreciated. Thanks.
Jackie Smith Cashion
Arxceo Corporation
jackie@arxceo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jun 13 01:00:52 2005