WebDAV is *very* useful ... esp. on a team of non-technical people managing
a large amount of content. They don't need full version control, but is a
must-have to be able to look at histories when needed. I am using WebDrive +
SVN WebDAV for some non-software projects and have nothing but good things
to say about it -- SVN functions as an awesome versioned file system. The
solution even works well over VPN and lower bandwidth connections. (Much
faster to browse a mounted WebDAV folder over a low-bandwidth connection
than a Windows fileshare!)
-Kyle
On 6/8/05, Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@collab.net> wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 8, 2005, at 3:17 PM, Eric Gorr wrote:
>
> > Nina Pham wrote:
> >
> >> I just upgrade my svn server to version 1.2 on my fedora core 2
> >> server and also try to use webdav autoversioning. I have some
> >> issues using webdav autoversioning on my XP PC which makes me not
> >> so sure about how useful webdav is.
> >>
> >
> > Without full DeltaV support, I don't find it terribly useful.
> >
>
> The point of autoversioning is to *hide* version control from non-
> technical users. In my world, that's pretty amazingly useful. :-)
>
> If subversion had full DeltaV support, the only thing you'd get is
> the ability to use a complex 3rd-party program to perform version
> control, instead of the normal svn client. That's something only
> technical users might want. I've never heard anyone ask for that;
> is that really what you're looking for? And if so, what commercial
> DeltaV client do you want to use against a subversion server?
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
Received on Thu Jun 9 15:27:09 2005