"C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato@collab.net> writes:
> Karl, it looks like you've already nailed the probable cause --
> mixed-revision working copy as the source of the copy. While doing a
> WC->URL copy, every time a file or directory's revision differs from
> that of its parent, that object is transmitted as its own distinct
> add-with-history operation. This is the correct behavior for WC->URL
> copies, though -- not a bug.
Well, not always, maybe? There are "real" revision differences and
"fake" ones. For example, suppose I do this:
$ svn co http://blahblahblah.com/repos/myproj/trunk/ myproj
[...]
Checked out revision 1729.
$ cd myproj
$ svn up -r 1728 foo.c
$
Let us assume that foo.c did not change in r1729 -- in fact, say foo.c
hasn't changed since r1. If I now do
$ svn cp -m "Make branch." \
http://blahblahblah.com/repos/myproj/trunk/ \
http://blahblahblah.com/repos/myproj/branches/newbranch/
Committed revision 1730.
$
...would we expect to see exactly one path in the 'svn log -v' output
for r1730, or two -- one add-with-history to create the branch from
r1729 of trunk, and another to splice foo.c@r1728 into that branch?
I'm not doing a very good job of articulating what I mean by a truly
mixed-revision working copy versus a fake one, but I think you see
what I mean. In a fake one, those cases where an object's revision
differs from that of its parent are spurious: were you to update the
object to its parent's revision, the node revision identity of the
object wouldn't actually change.
-Karl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue May 31 18:37:24 2005