[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn status 'G'?

From: Blair Zajac <blair_at_orcaware.com>
Date: 2005-05-27 01:45:43 CEST

Stephen Davis wrote:
> On May 26, 2005, at 2:36 PM, Michael L Brown wrote:
>
>> Andy McCarty <mccarw@lom.med.va.gov <mailto:mccarw@lom.med.va.gov>>
>> wrote on 05/26/2005 04:18:11 PM:
>>
>>> * Paul Burba <PaulB@softlanding.com <mailto:PaulB@softlanding.com>>
>>> [2005-05-26 17:01:18 -0400]:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> 'G' obviously makes sense as feedback from svn update, but I'm at a
>>>>
>> loss
>>
>>>> to figure out under what scenario svn status would produce it...any
>>>> thoughts?

I don't believe you'll see a G from the status command, so I'm wondering
if this is a docoumentation mistake. Doing what you'd think would show
a merged file shows M.

$ svn co -r 14800 http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/notes
$ cd notes
$ echo "some change" >> l10n-problems
$ svn status
M l10n-problems
$ svn update
G l10n-problems
Updated to revision 14856.
$ svn status
M l10n-problems

Regards,
Blair

-- 
Blair Zajac, Ph.D.
<blair@orcaware.com>
Subversion and Orca training and consulting
http://www.orcaware.com/svn/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri May 27 01:47:26 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.