[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: berkley db files 4.2 -> 4.3

From: ensonic <ensonic_at_hora-obscura.de>
Date: 2005-05-23 10:56:14 CEST

Hi Ben,
>
> On May 20, 2005, at 10:22 AM, Stefan Kost wrote:
>>
>> When trying to commit, I get:
>> OPTIONS request faild on '...'
>> The OPTIONS request returned invalid XML in the response: XML parse
>> error at line 1: no elemenr found (...)
>
> This is a vague apache error, and is not necessarily related to the
> 'health' of your database at all.
>
> To see if the database is healthy, try accessing it directly in one
> of many ways:
>
> $ svnlook youngest /path/to/repos
>
> $ svnadmin lstxns /path/to/repos
>
> $ svn ls file:///path/to/repos
>
all that works. but when ever I try to commit I get the following in my
apaches err_log :

[Mon May 23 10:51:00 2005] [error] [client 192.168.2.3] Could not fetch
resource information. [500, #0]
[Mon May 23 10:51:00 2005] [error] [client 192.168.2.3] Could not open
the requested SVN filesystem [500, #160029]
[Mon May 23 10:51:00 2005] [error] [client 192.168.2.3] Could not open
the requested SVN filesystem [500, #160029]
[Mon May 23 10:53:51 2005] [error] [client 192.168.2.3] (20014)Error
string not specified yet: Berkeley DB error while opening environment
for filesystem /srv/svn/motionstudios/db:\nPermission denied
[Mon May 23 10:53:51 2005] [error] [client 192.168.2.3] Could not fetch
resource information. [500, #0]
[Mon May 23 10:53:51 2005] [error] [client 192.168.2.3] Could not open
the requested SVN filesystem [500, #160029]
[Mon May 23 10:53:51 2005] [error] [client 192.168.2.3] Could not open
the requested SVN filesystem [500, #160029]
>>
>> Could somene please re-check it. It does not sound sane. After step
>> 4 the repos is maybe usable by berkley db 4.2 again, but it still
>> has not been updated to 4.3.
>
> There's nothing in-sane about it. In order for 4.3 libraries to
> access a 4.2 database, the only thing that needs to happen is for the
> logs and shared-memory segments to be reset. That's the definition
> of "update" in this case.
>
okay, that is not clear from the FAQ entry.
>>
>> Please, please just help people to use your product.
>
> Are you somehow suggesting that nobody gets any tech support on this
> list?
>
Sorry If I sound like this, but the first answer was "Instead of BDB,
feel free to use FSFS, where this is also not a problem.". Apart from
that I don't know what FSFS stands for (sounds like somesing with
'filesystem'), that suggestion wasn't helpful.

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon May 23 10:58:56 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.