Hi Ben,
Yes, I have. What puzzles me (may be something that I don't understand
here) is that in my case the diff actually does it work only when the
--notice-ancestry argument is provided. And it is showing *only* the
change that I made. Even if there was some ancestry issues with the
file, diff should have given a whole bunch of deleted lines and a
whole bunch of added lines when --notice-ancestry is given. The diff
command, from what I understood, does not care about the ancestry. So,
I expected a normal functioning of diff without the --notice-ancestry.
In other words, I am not able think of a situation where the diff
would work as I expected (that is show only the changes that I have
made) only when --notice-ancestry option is provided.
Thanks
-Hari
On 5/19/05, Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@collab.net> wrote:
>
> On May 19, 2005, at 10:36 PM, Hari Kodungallur wrote:
>
>
> > I am not able to understand the reasons for this. Can you tell me what
> > could be issue with the file that causes this behaviour?
>
>
> Have you read the part of chapter 4 that explains --notice-ancestry?
>
> http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.1/ch04s03.html#svn-ch-4-sect-3.3.4
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri May 20 07:24:11 2005