[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Licensing Issues (Windows Server)

From: Johnson, Rick <JohnsonR_at_gc.adventist.org>
Date: 2005-05-11 15:02:54 CEST

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Thomas [mailto:thomasgd@omc.bt.co.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 8:22 AM
> To: Johnson, Rick; users@subversion.tigris.org
> Subject: Re: Licensing Issues (Windows Server)
> On Wed, 11 May 2005 07:45:24 -0400, "Johnson, Rick"
> <JohnsonR@gc.adventist.org> wrote:
> >I'm going to jump in here and say that I don't think it's quite that
> >simple. I just reread the Windows Server 2003 EULA and it
> appears to me
> >that you need a CAL anytime you do Windows authentication (local or
> >domain authentication) for that server. That means the explanation
> >above is true until you do Windows authentication through
> Apache (such
> >as through LDAP to Active Directory or a Windows authentication
> >plug-in), then you're going to need a CAL for each user or
> machine that
> >authenticates.
> Surely it would be the server performing the authentication,
> not the server requesting the authentication (in this
> instance, acting as a
> client) (I've got my LDAP authentication talking to another server).
> That said, an authentication request is pretty short, so 10 (or
> whatever) simultaneous requests would probably handle a large
> number of users.
> Greg
> --
> This post represents the views of the author and does not
> necessarily accurately represent the views of BT.
I have my server set up like yours, I think . I have my Apache server
performing an LDAP call to my Active Directory server. I asked an M$ rep
about exactly this one time and he said that you need a CAL for each
user that is authenticated via Active Directory whether it's through
LDAP or Native authenticiation. In your case, if Apache is doing LDAP
authentication to, for instance, an OpenLDAP server then you don't need
a CAL. If it's doing LDAP authentication to an Active Directory server
then you do.

M$ take on it seems to be that Windows authentication is a function of
the Server and you need a CAL to use any Server functionality. That's my
definition of what the rep said, not his exact words. This is getting
muddied because server means both the Windows server and Apache or
Subversion servers.

As to your comment about 10 or so licenses covering a bunch of users.
This would be correct if M$ did concurrent licensing anymore but almost
all of their current licensing is NOT concurrent. You can buy a User CAL
or a Device CAL. A single User CAL allows a single SPECIFIC user to
access a Windows Server of that type (Windows 2000 and Windows 2003 have
different CALs so you might need both) for any computer. A Device CAL
allows a single SPECIFIC computer (but any number of users on that
computer) to access a Windows Server of that type.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed May 11 15:40:02 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.