Re: Restoring incremental backups with revisions missing

On 09 May 2005 11:12:10 -0500, kfogel@collab.net wrote:

>Don't blame Berkely DB, blame Subversion's, shall we say, unusual way
>of using Berkeley DB.
>
>(I just feel bad that Berkeley DB and Sleepycat software are getting
>undeserved bad press because of Subversion's idiosyncracies in how it
>uses BDB.)

Although given that svn is using BDB in a legitimate manner (albeit
unusual) and BDB is failing to cope with it, this would suggest a flaw
in BDB - though I recognise that Sleepycat are endeavouring to fix it.

That said, I'm using a c. 2GB, 2000 revision BDB back end with no
problems at all (he says, tempting fate).

Greg

-- 
This post represents the views of the author and does
not necessarily accurately represent the views of BT.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org