[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Restoring incremental backups with revisions missing

From: Greg Thomas <thomasgd_at_omc.bt.co.uk>
Date: 2005-05-10 11:42:17 CEST

On 09 May 2005 11:12:10 -0500, kfogel@collab.net wrote:

>Don't blame Berkely DB, blame Subversion's, shall we say, unusual way
>of using Berkeley DB.
>(I just feel bad that Berkeley DB and Sleepycat software are getting
>undeserved bad press because of Subversion's idiosyncracies in how it
>uses BDB.)

Although given that svn is using BDB in a legitimate manner (albeit
unusual) and BDB is failing to cope with it, this would suggest a flaw
in BDB - though I recognise that Sleepycat are endeavouring to fix it.

That said, I'm using a c. 2GB, 2000 revision BDB back end with no
problems at all (he says, tempting fate).


This post represents the views of the author and does
not necessarily accurately represent the views of BT.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue May 10 11:45:04 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.