I've been using FSFS for almost 6 months without any issues. We have a
repository sitting on a NFS share (file server running RAID) and
Subversion is run from a small local box. No issues that I have run
across yet. (knocking on some serious hardwood now).
We had to use FSFS because of the NFS issue. BDB is not supported on
NFS. I like that the default file system has now gone to FSFS. It
tells me that the Subversion developers also think that FSFS is the way
to go.
Regards,
Frank
Werner Punz wrote:
> Bryan D. Andrews wrote:
>
>> I have read the FSFS notes and read many posts from the archives and am
>> curious as to how many people are using FSFS?
>> It sounds great, but have others found it mature enough for primetime?
>> How long was this in development?
>>
>> Thanks for any info!
>
> Have been using it on OSX for quite a while now, my repository is
> around 2 Gig with 1800 revisions currently, I am working on the repo
> alone currently. I have yet to encounter a problem with it.
> Much less hazzle than the former BDB backend, and subjectively faster
> as well.
> Highly recommendable.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Apr 27 18:32:41 2005