[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Request for binary_obliterate (WAS Another request for obliterate)

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2005-04-16 11:39:46 CEST

Mike Dewhirst wrote:

> But what if you did let users mark stuff as
> unversioned_but_keep_the_latest_version? Maybe each obliterated item
> could be replaced by an entry pointing to the replacement item.
> A property of the entry would be a comment to that effect. Then when
> looking at the flow of events it would be clear what has happened - and
> who is to blame!

I'v been thinking about this on and off an have come to the conclustion
that it should, in fact, be fairly easy to add support for unversioned
files. However, you'd certainly _not_ want to indicate unversionedness
with a property, so I'm not sure we could add such a feature without
incompatible changes to the repository schema.

-- Brane

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Apr 16 11:41:34 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.