[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Another request for obliterate...

From: Peter N. Lundblad <peter_at_famlundblad.se>
Date: 2005-04-15 09:07:54 CEST

On Fri, 15 Apr 2005, Mike Dewhirst wrote:

> My understanding is that svn doesn't try to store deltas for binary data
> the way it does for text (source) files. IIRC it stores the entire file
> each time.
>
Where did you get that impression? svn treats text and binary data the
same regarding deltas.

> Thinking about what I wrote above, maybe binary files could be marked by
> the user as "only_store_the_latest_version_obliterate_all_previous". If
> so, there would be no need for an obliterate anything.
>
This is a reccurring request. The usual answer is: don't store files not
needing revision control in a revision control system, but use file
sharing instead. I can understand the convenience though, to have that
kind of file sharing integrated, so you get those files in place without
extra work. Scripting may help here.

Regards,
//Peter

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Apr 15 09:03:26 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.