[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion speed

From: Daniel Patterson <danpat_at_danpat.net>
Date: 2005-04-01 23:18:01 CEST

Bruce Cropley wrote:
> When we migrated, we started with Apache (no
> compression) and that was around 4 hours. Then we
> configured mod_deflate in http.conf, and tweaked the
> client file "servers" as required to get Apache style
> compression going. That only got it down to around 3
> hours.
>
> ....
>
> We're also seeing speed problems locally. A checkout
> from CVS was around 12m here. With SVN it is 36m+.
> Updates and commits also feel slower, though we
> haven't timed them as much yet.

   Subversion performance is definetly not the same as
   CVS for some operations (checkouts, updates, commits,
   etc). CVS has had a long time to optimise network
   traffic, and it shows.

   Your Melb -> LA setup sounds like it's bandwidth
   limited. Have you used ethereal or some other tool
   to actually measure how much data is going over the
   wire? (and comparing with/without mod_deflate for
   http access). Subsequent updates should be ok,
   as Subversion only sends deltas over the wire,
   but for initial checkouts, all the data must
   be transported.

   I'm not sure on the CVS protocol, but the SVN HTTP
   protocol has a reasonable amount of round-trips,
   at least one for every file. If you've got a stack
   of small files, a HTTP GET request will be sent
   for each one. If you have high bandwidth, but high
   latency, that's going to be a factor. svnserve is
   probably better behaving.

   Consider how often these slow operations will be
   performed. You can often use "svn switch" to
   quickly get a working copy of a branch. Tagging
   is *very* fast when compared to CVS. You have
   atomic commits and the ability to re-arrange
   your repository without losing or breaking
   history. Personally, these outweigh a bit
   of a performance drop (consider if the performance
   hit is for rare operations only).

   And be thankful you're not using Clearcase :-)
   (which is unusable in a WAN situation, and requires
    an uber-complicated "multi-site" configuration).

daniel

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Apr 1 23:30:03 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.