[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: daily "Cannot allocate memory"-problem

From: Dirk Schenkewitz <schenkewitz_at_docomolab-euro.com>
Date: 2005-03-23 10:25:09 CET


tekHedd wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
> |>>>> I'm getting a bit annoyed that the automatic answer to every BDB
> |>>>> problem is "switch to FSFS". :-)
> I am just switching to svn for new projects, and it seems to be working
> OK with BDB 4.1, but the projects are pretty small so far. I am feeling
> too deal with getting the latest bdb and so on, especially since the
> server is not my problem.
> My question is: is there a good reason that I should _not_ use FSFS?

I nearly asked this myself, but then I remembered about this "comparison
sheet" (FSFS vs. BDB): http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/notes/fsfs
That's all I know. If anyone knows more, I would also like to know.

> I will initially be using svn+ssh using a shared account and
> certificates, but later plan to integrate more with apache...

Being a newbie myself, I'm on thin ice here, but I believe that you can
select any on these completely independent of the backend.

> Regards,
> tomS

Have fun

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Mar 23 10:25:44 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.