Re: Bug: svn revert annoys the user by behaving differently from all other commands
From: Markus Bertheau ☠<twanger_at_bluetwanger.de>
Date: 2005-03-22 12:37:39 CET
В Втр, 22/03/2005 в 11:45 +0100, Nathan Maman пишет:
> The person said to forget the change, the computer never decided
I was arguing against 'svn forget' in general. I see little point in it.
> If the user does not read the documentation, how did he hear about 'svn
He reads svn help and then svn help revert: "Restore pristine working
> Jokes apart, if that is want you want, you would probably be better off
svn revert is fine in itself, it just shouldn't annoy the user. I don't
> >Plus, at 1 o'clock I might think that I really want to forget them
Given the fact that at present time, all these local changes are lost,
> > If your ambitions are overdrawn, you can't succeed. I don't want to
> I agree completely. But that does not answer the questions:
More than zero is an improvement. I suggest 1. More than one revert in a
> 2. for how long?
Until the next revert.
> 3. should we keep them for any file type and any file size?
I don't see why not. In regard to this svn revert should behave
> PS: if you think this discussion does not belong to the list, just say
I think it's fine here.
Markus
-- Markus Bertheau ☠<twanger@bluetwanger.de> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Tue Mar 22 12:40:14 2005 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.