Re: Feature request: svn clean
From: Erik Huelsmann <e.huelsmann_at_gmx.net>
Date: 2005-03-21 15:47:03 CET
> Hello,
The fact that you are referring to those files as 'build artifacts' should
> Should we leave cleanup for makefiles? No - we are suppose to
> Delete all+fresh chekout is _very_ costy
Maybe you should create an out-of-tree build, or export a tree from your
> Scripts? Ok - they work well. But! Our ccnet is writen in c# and should
If you have a system which runs on all platforms, why not use it to write
> So portability issue. Of course - we could rewrite that script
> Is it pottentionally harmfull operation? I dont think so. In our case
>In real working copies it could be different, but I think it is
> So if I type "svn revert" or "svn clean" in mine wc,
Local changes in versioned files, yes.
I'm having an extremely hard time thinking of a good reason why this belongs
I'm sorry if this mail is a bit harsh, but I hope the
bye,
Erik.
-- "Happy ProMail" bis 24. März: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/promail Zum 6. Geburtstag gibt's GMX ProMail jetzt 66 Tage kostenlos! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Mon Mar 21 16:06:48 2005 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.