[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: revision number upper boundary?

From: v4r4n <console.cowboy_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2005-03-10 02:40:18 CET

I'm surprised this debate has not gone into the possible back end
(file system) limitations of having a repository of 2 billion
revisions, let alone performance issues (svn log... without -r... oh
boy).

Just looking at one variable seems to be foolish, but this isn't a
developer thread :)

On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 10:10:19 -0600, Steve Greenland <steveg@lsli.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 09:04:09AM -0500, Karan, Cem (Civ, ARL/CISD) wrote:
> > This is what stdint.h and limits.h are supposed to solve.
> > Unfortunately, I don't know what C standard they were added to (I know
> > that it is in C99) so using them may break older compilers.
>
> Limits.h is C89, commonly available early. Stdint.h is C99, and trivial
> to generate for a particular system. Well, trivial so long as you don't
> require that "int_fastN_t" actually mean something. That okay, though,
> because the standard doesn't.
>
> Steve
>
> --
> "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask
> about Exchange Server next.
> -- (Stolen from the net)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Mar 10 02:42:44 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.