[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: revision number upper boundary?

From: Travis <svn_at_castle.fastmail.fm>
Date: 2005-03-09 01:47:34 CET

On Mar 8, 2005, at 4:23 PM, Steve Greenland wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 08:15:43PM -0000, Max Bowsher wrote:
>> 2147483647, i.e. slightly more than 2 billion.
>> That's assuming you are using a 32bit machine, of course.
>> So, if you make 1 commit every second without pause, that will last
>> you
>> until the year 2073, by which time, it's a fairly safe bet that you
>> will
>> have moved on to a 64bit machine, and can enjoy the freedom to have
>> up to 9
>> quintillion revisions.
> ObOffTopic: actually, many C implementations for 64bit OS's keep 'long'
> as a 32 bit quantity, using the abomination 'long long' for 64bit
> integer types.
> So as long (heh!) as the subversion revision is kept typed as
> 'long int', it will likely stay a 32 bit integer.

Really? A quick double-check shows that 64-bit longs ("LP64") are
present when invoking the compile-for-64bit option on these various

  - gcc 3.2.3 on a 64-bit Opteron Linux
  - xlc on AIX (many versions)
  - cc on 64-bit HPUX system
  - cc (SUNWspro) on SunOS 5.7


To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Mar 9 01:50:14 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.