Re: Is FSFS ready for productive use?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Feb 7, 2005, at 10:08 AM, Marc Haisenko wrote:

> I found both to be stable, although FSFS _seems_ to cause less trouble
> (BDB

We switched over a 100 BDB subversion repositories to FSFS (and it's
the default for a couple hundred more) once it was available. We
regularly had wedging issues when using multiple access methods with
busy Trac sites, and since switching entirely to FSFS have not had a
single issue (not a single problem).

For example, the http://dev.rubyonrails.com/browser/ repository has
done about 400 revisions since going FSFS without issue, while before
it would be regularly wedged.

- - Jason

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1

iQA/AwUBQgewzFUyB+ajXkCLEQLJ8gCgxgK7KhFACX7TG8SK9eJqvCOImp0AoKAB
Fz+nX0jB/ybiRG1WQZmESI6z
=qELc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Feb 7 19:22:32 2005