Fuzzy wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Max Bowsher maxb-at-ukf.net wrote:
>
>
>
>> Something's screwed up in your build: It didn't attempt to install apr
>> and
>> aprutil at all.
>>
>
>> That had follow-on effects throughout the rest of the install. It's
>> probably
>> also looking into where the "/usr/local/apr" paths came from.
>>
>
>> Max.
>
>
>
> Could that be because of the `--without-apxs' flag at all? It wouldn't
> get
> past the make without it as there is a version of apache installed (which
> I
> don't want subversion to have anything to do with, hence
> the --without-apache
> flag!) already (httpd-2.0.43).
>
> I don't want to use apache with subversion, I just want to use svnserve,
> hence not bothering to update apache.
>
> The apr version there *is* the version subversion installed at least:
>
> su-2.05a# /usr/local/apr/bin/apr-config --version
>
> 0.9.5
No, --without-apxs is good. --without-apache is actually unnecessary, since
it actually controls the building of *static* apache modules, which defaults
to disabled anyway.
Subversion would not install an apr into /usr/local/apr.
I think that to some extent you are going to be stuck debugging these build
problems yourself - it really needs hands on work.
Max.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jan 31 22:46:13 2005